Operation Disclosure | By David Lifschultz, Contributing Writer October 17, 2020 NATO ALLIANCE IS OVER Compliments of the Lifschultz Organi...
Operation Disclosure | By David Lifschultz, Contributing Writer
October 17, 2020
NATO ALLIANCE IS OVER
Compliments of the Lifschultz Organization founded in 1899
We discussed below the Southeast Asian alliance between the US, South Korea and Taiwan against China as being over when the US threatened North Korea with a nuclear attack when the US believed that the North Koreans did not have an ICBM and submarine missile capacity to hit the US back with nuclear weapons which is no longer the case. That was a shock to Japan and South Korea because that meant that the short-range nuclear missiles of North Korea would wipe them out in the event of the US attack selfishly destroying North Korea while abandoning them. This made it clear to Japan and South Korea that they were expendable and the US commitment to protect them with their nuclear deterrent was worthless for it would not be used if South Korea or Japan was attacked as the US had no intention of losing millions of their civilians over them.
The same is true for NATO. NATO has insufficient conventional capacity to deter the Russians should they desire to conventionally attack Europe and the Russian shock armies would reach the English channel in two weeks. The key defence of NATO is air power that is far superior to that of Russia which would be knocked out by Russian hypersonic missiles within ten minutes after the initiation of hostilities by just destroying the NATO air fields. And the Russian shock armies would run through the NATO conventional forces within two weeks. There is no question that the US will use nuclear weapons to attack Russia incurring 200 million dead Americans as the Russians retaliate. It is out of the question and will never happen. And yet NATO seems oblivious to the danger sanctioning Russia over their defensive action over the Kiev coup that the NATO (BND-CIA) launched themselves to remove one of Russia's strategic buffers. Nor do NATO members hesitate to stir up a color revolution in Belarus to remove yet another strategic buffer to Russia based on false flag poisonings attributed to Russia. It is as though they live in the delusion of invincibility of 1945 after fighting the weak remnant of the German Army in France while 80% of the German army with its crack panzer divisions were on the Russian front.
90% of the Russian military budget is off budget and amounts to over 300 billion US dollars. At 1/7 of our costs, we would in the US have to spend 2.1 trillion to keep up. The modernization of the Russian military into shock armies started in 2008 which is mostly completed and their missile programs, which is the weapon of the next war as air power and tanks were in World War Two, are twenty years ahead of the US with the S-700 defensive missile coming out shortly. The S-600 defensive missile is rolled out. Their hypersonic advanced offensive missiles are far in advance of the US. Russia never stopped their missile program in the 1990s though they did not have the money to make prototypes. Their work was authenticated by prototypes between 2000-2008 where huge advances were made while the US with a sense of invincibility entered meaningless brushfire wars. The US focused on Afghanistan and Iraq spending estimated at 5.2 trillion dollars.
https://www.nationalpriorities.org/cost-of/war/
“One thing needs to be clear: If someone shoots at our planes, we will destroy them. It doesn’t matter if it’s an S-300 or an S-700,” Israeli Defence Minister Avigdor Lieberman said (4-24-18, the S-700 source was the Mossad.)
It is hard to say what the US military budget is as we practice purposeful off budget financing ourselves as evidenced by the quote below:
9/10/2001: Rumsfeld says $2.3 TRILLION Missing from Pentagon
A missile conveniently destroyed the data on the 2.3 trillion on 9-11 at the Pentagon as internal demolitions placed in the basements of the World Trade Center in accordance with advanced engineering standards brought them down in a controlled, demolition into its own footprint. The passenger planes hitting the buildings were what was called by Harry Houdini a form of misdirection.
The failure of a plane to hit Building Number 7 created a crisis in the White House as the demolitions might have been found there, and Cheney called number one in the Deep State to bail the situation out. Number one had been dismayed by the Taliban, our erstwhile ally against the Soviets, shutting down the US intelligence-US military heroin operation in Afghanistan. Therefore, it was natural to advise Cheney no action would be taken unless the heroin operation was reopened first. Then, the intelligence organizations assumed control of the coverup upon agreement by Cheney that the first invasion of an Islamic country would be Afghanistan to restart the heroin operation and then the invasion of Iraq would follow.
In 2001, prices surged tenfold from 2000, to a record high, after the Taliban all but eliminated opium poppy cultivation across the Afghan territory under its control.
The US overthrow of the Taliban after 9-11 brought back the Afghani production to 93% of the world market as the US intelligence agencies restarted production. The profits were shared by the DIA and CIA, etc.
Afghanistan and the CIA Heroin Ratline
The boarding tapes were doctored to show Islamic fighters which did not exist in order to blame it on Osama bin Laden a former CIA asset that had gone bad killing some of our agents. This justified the invasion. Building number seven went down on the afternoon of 9-11 which was so transparent a false flag operation that the 9-11 Commission did not even investigate it.
When Dick Cheney was about to have an Interpol arrest warrant issued against him based on corruption charges in Nigeria that had sent most of his Halliburton executives to jail, George Bush I and James Baker interceded to quash the arrest warrant lest the 9-11 participation by George Bush II brought him down.
The official US military budget is 738 billion while the Russian is 65.1 billion. Most of the US money is wasted. Senior officers go in retirement to the boards of the major military suppliers exemplifying the conflicts of interest. The US has been lulled to sleep all these years. and the Trump Administration has waked them up.
Eisenhower was right.
Eisenhower Warns of Military Industrial Complex in 1961 Farewell Address
Next, we go into details of the problem of Japan and Korea and the internal destruction of the US by the military industrial complex.
US COMMITS SUICIDE: DEATH BY A THOUSAND CUTS
DAVID K. LIFSCHULTZ
Compliments of the Lifschultz Organization founded in 1899
We quote below Grant Newsham a former Marine Office who explains how the military industrial complex has completely bankrupted and destroyed the United States by giving away its industries to support our alliances. They bequeath to us 27 trillion dollars in national debt, a ten trillion dollar net deficit position on the US foreign accounts, and a hollowed out industry rusting away in the rust belt.
La guerre! C’est une chose trop grave pour la confier à des militaires.
War is too serious a matter to entrust to military men.
Here is the answer next:
Robert Rubin Correspondence – David Lifschultz
Here is Grant Newsham's folly:
But Washington can help itself.
First, don’t demand more money from South Korea for US troops – and stop threatening to withdraw US forces if Seoul doesn’t pay up. All that does is anger people – many of whom are either pro-American or on the fence.
Second, give South Korea preferential trade advantages. The US should have done this immediately after (or even before) the PRC launched an economic war against Seoul over the THAAD deployment. That was a lost opportunity, but it’s not too late.
Third, admit that Moon Jae-in represents a group of Koreans who have different interests and values from ours – and different from those of many South Koreans as well. Stay on guard.
Fourth, Washington might take a look at the April 2020 election, and decide for itself.
So don’t assume the US-South Korea relationship is rock solid.
If the South Korea-US alliance unravels it will be a disaster with global effects, so pay attention. Let’s hope the day won’t come as it did in Turkey, Iran, Venezuela, the Philippines and other places when we hear dumbstruck US officials whine, “Never saw that coming.”
Grant Newsham, a retired US Marine Corps officer and former US diplomat, currently is a senior research fellow at the Japan Forum for Strategic Studies and the Center for Security Policy. This article originally appeared October 8 in And Magazine. It is republished with permission.
DKL resumes commentary:
Yes. South Korea is disillusioned with the US. Why? The main reason is the US can no longer use nuclear weapons to stop a North Korean invasion as the North's nuclear weapons can reach the US. As to the troops that are there, they do not mean anything in that they cannot stop the North Koreans. South Korea is, therefore, alone. They hate Japan and that only leaves China as a potential ally to restrain North Korea.
What this means is that all those nations will shift to China. The key change was when the US was threatening to bomb North Korea sacrificing Japan and South Korea. That really was the end of the alliance.
Then, there is the issue of the US versus China on let's say cell phones. Should South Korea sacrifice a 1.4 billion person market for about 333 million market of the US. Shall South Korea not sell to China because the US is in a trade war with China? The alliance is over.
David Lifschultz
THE LIFSCHULTZ ORGANIZATION
DAVID@LIFSCHULTZORGANIZATION.COM
______________________________________________________
Guest Posting
If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com applying these following rules.
The subject of your email entry should be: "Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure"
- Must be in text format
- Proper Grammar
- No foul language
- Your signature/name/username at the top
______________________________________________________
Newsletter
If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe here.
______________________________________________________
Our mission at Operation Disclosure is to bring you important news events and raw intel from various sources focused on exposing the Deep State/Cabal and their downfall. We are also focused on disclosing our lost ancient origins and extraterrestrial contact.
Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.
Copyright © 2020 Operation Disclosure
October 17, 2020
NATO ALLIANCE IS OVER
Compliments of the Lifschultz Organization founded in 1899
We discussed below the Southeast Asian alliance between the US, South Korea and Taiwan against China as being over when the US threatened North Korea with a nuclear attack when the US believed that the North Koreans did not have an ICBM and submarine missile capacity to hit the US back with nuclear weapons which is no longer the case. That was a shock to Japan and South Korea because that meant that the short-range nuclear missiles of North Korea would wipe them out in the event of the US attack selfishly destroying North Korea while abandoning them. This made it clear to Japan and South Korea that they were expendable and the US commitment to protect them with their nuclear deterrent was worthless for it would not be used if South Korea or Japan was attacked as the US had no intention of losing millions of their civilians over them.
The same is true for NATO. NATO has insufficient conventional capacity to deter the Russians should they desire to conventionally attack Europe and the Russian shock armies would reach the English channel in two weeks. The key defence of NATO is air power that is far superior to that of Russia which would be knocked out by Russian hypersonic missiles within ten minutes after the initiation of hostilities by just destroying the NATO air fields. And the Russian shock armies would run through the NATO conventional forces within two weeks. There is no question that the US will use nuclear weapons to attack Russia incurring 200 million dead Americans as the Russians retaliate. It is out of the question and will never happen. And yet NATO seems oblivious to the danger sanctioning Russia over their defensive action over the Kiev coup that the NATO (BND-CIA) launched themselves to remove one of Russia's strategic buffers. Nor do NATO members hesitate to stir up a color revolution in Belarus to remove yet another strategic buffer to Russia based on false flag poisonings attributed to Russia. It is as though they live in the delusion of invincibility of 1945 after fighting the weak remnant of the German Army in France while 80% of the German army with its crack panzer divisions were on the Russian front.
90% of the Russian military budget is off budget and amounts to over 300 billion US dollars. At 1/7 of our costs, we would in the US have to spend 2.1 trillion to keep up. The modernization of the Russian military into shock armies started in 2008 which is mostly completed and their missile programs, which is the weapon of the next war as air power and tanks were in World War Two, are twenty years ahead of the US with the S-700 defensive missile coming out shortly. The S-600 defensive missile is rolled out. Their hypersonic advanced offensive missiles are far in advance of the US. Russia never stopped their missile program in the 1990s though they did not have the money to make prototypes. Their work was authenticated by prototypes between 2000-2008 where huge advances were made while the US with a sense of invincibility entered meaningless brushfire wars. The US focused on Afghanistan and Iraq spending estimated at 5.2 trillion dollars.
https://www.nationalpriorities.org/cost-of/war/
“One thing needs to be clear: If someone shoots at our planes, we will destroy them. It doesn’t matter if it’s an S-300 or an S-700,” Israeli Defence Minister Avigdor Lieberman said (4-24-18, the S-700 source was the Mossad.)
It is hard to say what the US military budget is as we practice purposeful off budget financing ourselves as evidenced by the quote below:
9/10/2001: Rumsfeld says $2.3 TRILLION Missing from Pentagon
A missile conveniently destroyed the data on the 2.3 trillion on 9-11 at the Pentagon as internal demolitions placed in the basements of the World Trade Center in accordance with advanced engineering standards brought them down in a controlled, demolition into its own footprint. The passenger planes hitting the buildings were what was called by Harry Houdini a form of misdirection.
The failure of a plane to hit Building Number 7 created a crisis in the White House as the demolitions might have been found there, and Cheney called number one in the Deep State to bail the situation out. Number one had been dismayed by the Taliban, our erstwhile ally against the Soviets, shutting down the US intelligence-US military heroin operation in Afghanistan. Therefore, it was natural to advise Cheney no action would be taken unless the heroin operation was reopened first. Then, the intelligence organizations assumed control of the coverup upon agreement by Cheney that the first invasion of an Islamic country would be Afghanistan to restart the heroin operation and then the invasion of Iraq would follow.
In 2001, prices surged tenfold from 2000, to a record high, after the Taliban all but eliminated opium poppy cultivation across the Afghan territory under its control.
The US overthrow of the Taliban after 9-11 brought back the Afghani production to 93% of the world market as the US intelligence agencies restarted production. The profits were shared by the DIA and CIA, etc.
Afghanistan and the CIA Heroin Ratline
The boarding tapes were doctored to show Islamic fighters which did not exist in order to blame it on Osama bin Laden a former CIA asset that had gone bad killing some of our agents. This justified the invasion. Building number seven went down on the afternoon of 9-11 which was so transparent a false flag operation that the 9-11 Commission did not even investigate it.
When Dick Cheney was about to have an Interpol arrest warrant issued against him based on corruption charges in Nigeria that had sent most of his Halliburton executives to jail, George Bush I and James Baker interceded to quash the arrest warrant lest the 9-11 participation by George Bush II brought him down.
The official US military budget is 738 billion while the Russian is 65.1 billion. Most of the US money is wasted. Senior officers go in retirement to the boards of the major military suppliers exemplifying the conflicts of interest. The US has been lulled to sleep all these years. and the Trump Administration has waked them up.
Eisenhower was right.
Eisenhower Warns of Military Industrial Complex in 1961 Farewell Address
Next, we go into details of the problem of Japan and Korea and the internal destruction of the US by the military industrial complex.
US COMMITS SUICIDE: DEATH BY A THOUSAND CUTS
DAVID K. LIFSCHULTZ
Compliments of the Lifschultz Organization founded in 1899
We quote below Grant Newsham a former Marine Office who explains how the military industrial complex has completely bankrupted and destroyed the United States by giving away its industries to support our alliances. They bequeath to us 27 trillion dollars in national debt, a ten trillion dollar net deficit position on the US foreign accounts, and a hollowed out industry rusting away in the rust belt.
La guerre! C’est une chose trop grave pour la confier à des militaires.
War is too serious a matter to entrust to military men.
Here is the answer next:
Robert Rubin Correspondence – David Lifschultz
Here is Grant Newsham's folly:
But Washington can help itself.
First, don’t demand more money from South Korea for US troops – and stop threatening to withdraw US forces if Seoul doesn’t pay up. All that does is anger people – many of whom are either pro-American or on the fence.
Second, give South Korea preferential trade advantages. The US should have done this immediately after (or even before) the PRC launched an economic war against Seoul over the THAAD deployment. That was a lost opportunity, but it’s not too late.
Third, admit that Moon Jae-in represents a group of Koreans who have different interests and values from ours – and different from those of many South Koreans as well. Stay on guard.
Fourth, Washington might take a look at the April 2020 election, and decide for itself.
So don’t assume the US-South Korea relationship is rock solid.
If the South Korea-US alliance unravels it will be a disaster with global effects, so pay attention. Let’s hope the day won’t come as it did in Turkey, Iran, Venezuela, the Philippines and other places when we hear dumbstruck US officials whine, “Never saw that coming.”
Grant Newsham, a retired US Marine Corps officer and former US diplomat, currently is a senior research fellow at the Japan Forum for Strategic Studies and the Center for Security Policy. This article originally appeared October 8 in And Magazine. It is republished with permission.
DKL resumes commentary:
Yes. South Korea is disillusioned with the US. Why? The main reason is the US can no longer use nuclear weapons to stop a North Korean invasion as the North's nuclear weapons can reach the US. As to the troops that are there, they do not mean anything in that they cannot stop the North Koreans. South Korea is, therefore, alone. They hate Japan and that only leaves China as a potential ally to restrain North Korea.
What this means is that all those nations will shift to China. The key change was when the US was threatening to bomb North Korea sacrificing Japan and South Korea. That really was the end of the alliance.
Then, there is the issue of the US versus China on let's say cell phones. Should South Korea sacrifice a 1.4 billion person market for about 333 million market of the US. Shall South Korea not sell to China because the US is in a trade war with China? The alliance is over.
David Lifschultz
THE LIFSCHULTZ ORGANIZATION
DAVID@LIFSCHULTZORGANIZATION.COM
______________________________________________________
Guest Posting
If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com applying these following rules.
The subject of your email entry should be: "Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure"
- Must be in text format
- Proper Grammar
- No foul language
- Your signature/name/username at the top
______________________________________________________
If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe here.
______________________________________________________
Our mission at Operation Disclosure is to bring you important news events and raw intel from various sources focused on exposing the Deep State/Cabal and their downfall. We are also focused on disclosing our lost ancient origins and extraterrestrial contact.
Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.
Copyright © 2020 Operation Disclosure
