Operation Disclosure | By David Lifschultz, Contributing Writer September 17, 2020 RUSSIA NATURAL ALLY OF THE US TODAY AS DURING THE CI...
Operation Disclosure | By David Lifschultz, Contributing Writer
September 17, 2020
RUSSIA NATURAL ALLY OF THE US TODAY AS DURING THE CIVIL WAR
The purpose of this review is to propose the reorganization of US foreign policy by withdrawing from NATO and allying with Russia. The Russian Tsar during the Civil War sent his fleet to the North to demonstrate to the British who had fomented the south in the US Civil War that Russia stood behind the northern states. This had a material impact on the Civil War in favor of the north.
Today we would wish to draw Britain into an alliance with the US and Russia against the EU and a NATO. The US would leave NATO.
The comments below are by a CIA friend who is concerned about Russia sending troops into Belarus. He compares this to the invasion of Hungary and Czechoslovakia in the 1950s. There is a great difference here. When the US dismantled Russia through the CIA agent Yeltsin it stranded about 25 million Russians in Countries as the Ukraine, and other areas. If the eastern Ukraine from the Dnieper east were to be allowed a plebiscite as to whether they would like to go back to Russia, the eastern Ukraine would vote to go back to Russia. It was Lenin who gave the eastern Ukraine part of Russia known today as the Eastern Ukraine which is to all intents and purposes Russia. This may be the case with Belarus as Russia is popular there but not its present oligarchs. In fact, the looting oligarchs in the Ukraine are not popular at all. So the differences here are dramatically different.
Here is what my CIA friend has said to which I have responded to above:
By contrast, Russia invaded Hungary at the “invitation” of the Hungarian government and against the wishes of the Hungarian population, which was hostile to Russia and Communism at the time. Russia invaded Czechoslovakia at the “invitation” of the Czechoslovak government (although both Dubcek and Svoboda assured me that they did not want Russian troops in the country) while the population was in a very anti-Russian and anti-Communist mood. I know because I was in Prague then.
Let's review the history below as to actually what had happened in the 20th century.
Hungary declared war against the Soviets on 27 June 1941. On 1 July 1941, under German instruction, the Hungarian "Carpathian Group" (Karpat Group) attacked the 12th Soviet Army. Attached to the German 17th Army, the Karpat Group advanced far into Soviet Ukraine, and, later, southern Russia.
It must be remembered that most of Europe was under the control of Germany in 1941 and many furnished troops in the SS as the Wallonian SS volunteer Legion under the notable SS General Leon Degrelle for fighting against Russia. It was not too dissimilar to what happened under Napoleon in his invasion of Russia or Europe today which is organized in NATO against Russia essentially controlled by Germany as in World War Two as France under Napoleon. Germany has achieved all its objectives of World War Two today in its dictatorial dominance of Europe through NATO and the EU. The US sponsorship of Germany after World War Two was purely a balance of power move against Russia which had nothing to do with communism as the same sponsorship exists today against Russia that is no longer communist. Only the US has picked today the wrong enemy as it usually does.
The German EU goal was achieved through currency rigging and artful diplomacy by which it has built its industries on the destruction of the US industries. This is analyzed below in my exchange of correspondence with the then Secretary of the Treasury of the United States.
Robert Rubin Correspondence – David Lifschultz
The EU was formed by Germany to destroy the US and Russia. The latter two today are natural allies against this treachery. The EU as an economic unit was set up to give Germany economies of scale even if that meant destroying companies as Fiat to gain VW economies of scale as the US had in its United States. Then, Germany based on European economies of scale was able to do more damage to the US based on its controlled European based economies of scale. This is combined with the rigging of the euro which should be 1.50 to a dollar compared to about 1.04 before the coronavirus. This rigged euro did grave damage to the US industries which is now largely a rust belt. The NATO extension into eastern Europe was solely based on the demand of German industry that they have protection for the massive investments planned for Poland and eastern Europe. German industry was still concerned about Russian power. In other words, the granting of liberty of Eastern Europe by Russia was not to be a planned extension of Europe east under NATO but it was. Germany intended from the beginning to extend NATO east by destroying Russia in 1991.
The Normandy invasion had as its objective to prevent the Russians from overrunning all of Europe to the English Channel. The delay was convenient in that it was hoped and planned by Churchill that Germany and Russian would destroy each other as they had done in World War One which was the British objective in each war. Churchill wanted Russia destroyed to protect India in World War Two as in World War One and Germany to be destroyed as in World War One as becoming too powerful. Churchill massively erred by the Russian miscalculation which cost Britain the loss of India and her entire Empire to Russia and the United States.
The US does not have a massive trade deficit with Russia and Russia has done nothing to hurt the US today. Actually, the US and Germany were behind the dismantlement of Russia which enabled Germany under the guidance of the plan of Dr. Hjalmar Horace Greeley Schacht plan to reorganize eastern Europe under Germany.
The action the US must take now is advise Germany that if the euro is not repriced to 1.5 to a dollar that all EU exports to the US will be tariffed out. And the. US should unilaterally withdraw from NATO and ally with Russia. The EU is the enemy of the US and not Russia.
CAN RUSSIA HAVE PEACE NOW?
DAVID K. LIFSCHULTZ
AT THE RUSSIAN DUMA PEACE CONFERENCE AT THE DUMA
The position of Prussia in Germany will not be determined by its liberalism but by its power ... Prussia must concentrate its strength and hold it for the favourable moment, which has already come and gone several times. Since the treaties of Vienna, our frontiers have been ill-designed for a healthy body politic. Not through speeches and majority decisions will the great questions of the day be decided - that was the great mistake of 1848 and 1849 - but by iron and blood.
Can we have peace when Russians are being pounded with mortars in Donbas? Can we have peace when Russians are being mistreated in former Russian territories where twenty-five million Russians reside? The answer is no.
The position is not so different than when Germany after World War One had millions of Germans cut off from Germany at Versailles as Danzig that was 99% German and entitled to a mandate vote by the United Nations that was denied to it. This was the catalyst of World War Two when at the outset of that war Germany and Russia were allies. However, Germany lost the war and Russia did not.
There was treason within Russia that destroyed their nation in 1991 as during the Bolshevik Revolution. Russia had not lost World War One but the revolutions destroyed a Russia that could have made peace on its front. After World War Two this problem was avoided by all Germans who were left outside Germany being forced to move back to Germany during which many perished. This is even being discussed in the west in the highest circles as relates to the 25 million Russians caught outside of Russia by Yeltsin's illegal tearing the Baltic States, Ukraine and Central Asia away from Russia. Western circles want them expelled to Russia as we expelled the Germans.
The Ukraine was part of Russia for nearly 400 years. The very idea of its independence was invented in Austria during World War One for the purpose of undermining the Russian Army and it certainly did undermine the Russian Army during that war. The present independence of the Ukraine was set up so the local Trotskyite oligarchs could loot the country as a Russian aligned government was about to move against the oligarchs. That essentially is the history of most of the areas torn from Russia by Yeltsin under western orders.
The Kiev coup was set up by Brzezinski to draw Russia into a new partisan war as in Afghanistan and was accompanied by his ordering the Gulf States to crash the oil price. Brzezinski was concerned about the massive buildup of the Russian Armed Forces starting in 2000 in missiles as well as the modernization of its ground forces and wanted to strike before it was too late. Russia moved to protect the Russians in the Crimea and the Donbas and Luhansk leading to more sanctions. All of it was a setup.
Russia refused to send its armies into the Ukraine, even that part that was strongly pro-Russian such as the eastern Ukraine east of the Dnieper River (which was historically part of Mother Russia), so as not to become bogged down in another Partisan War leaving the rest of the Ukraine to be looted by oligarchs supported by the west and watched its internal financial collapse. The west would not fund the Ukraine's economy adequately and let it collapse. Most of the IMF injections were stolen by the oligarchs when they transferred their loot out of the country using the IMF money giving them the western currency. These oligarchical looters were backed by the Rothschilds as those in Russia and we see that evidence in the ownership by Lord Jacob Rothschild of all of Khodorkovsky's now worthless Yukos stock. They are Trotskyites as those in Russia now. The Trotskyites of the Bolshevik Revolution backed by Baron Eduard de Rothschild were also Trotskyites or wolves in different sheep's clothing and stole Russia's wealth then until Stalin stopped them in their tracks. Between 1991 to 1999 the equivalent of the present entire householder wealth of Russia was stolen and transferred overseas mostly to London under Lord Jacob Rothschild under today's Trotskyites. A Trotskyite merely changes his clothing from Marxism to capitalism but never his inner nature. Now they are ruining Russia with sanctions as Putin stopped the looting. Why is this tolerated?
King James Bible: Matthew 7:15
Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
Kiev was an attempted replay of Afghanistan though in the Ukraine Russia did not play there their Afghani part but watched the Ukraine collapse on its own.
Brzezinski thwarted in the Ukraine then created the pipeline crisis in Syria announcing a new pipeline through Syria from Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey to the EU to destroy the Russian exports of natural gas to the EU and that was the basis for opening up Iran by the west. When Iran did not send their natural gas to the EU, the sanctions were reimposed. In order to accomplish this civil war in Syria, Brzezinski brought in the US created Sunni ISIS to start a civil war. ISIS was originally set up by the US to offset the Shia in Iraq allied to Iran, and to weaken the Shia ally al Maliki, and these forces were unleashed on Syria in a civil war. The rise of the Shia was promoted by the colossal blunder by the US destroying Sunni Iraq. Russia moved in to protect Syria with help from Iran, Hezbollah, and Shia contributing the costly boots on the ground and Russia largely providing air power and they won these allies. Russia's success at the same time blocked the pipeline that was to be used to destroy Russia. The reason all the Zionist Congressmen and Senators vote for sanctions on Russia is that Israel was infuriated by Russia holding up Syria. They prefer Medvedev to replace Putin. Netanyahu is no friend of Putin.
This left Russia damaged in 2014 by the sanctions; the costs of helping Russians in Donbas and Luhansk; the Syrian war and the oil price crash. Since all of this was due to Russia becoming militarily rebuilt unbeknown to Brzezinski until about 2012-2013, it was expected that Russia would in this game of chess move its Queen to protect itself by advising the west that if the sanctions were not removed Russia would default on its 700 billion dollars of external debt. The involuntary default of 1998 had nearly brought down the entire western financial system when a mere two to three hundred billion dollars went into default triggering the implosion of Long Term Capital Management of their 1.8 trillion dollar derivative position and the near implosion of the western financial system. It was anticipated the west would back down but Russian did not move its Queen but accepted the punishment squeezing its population in the process and creating a massive brain drain of talented Russians to the west based on their highly advanced educational system. The CIA could not believe that Russia was so stupid. Stalin's repute as a consequence is now at 70% approval rating and Putin at 25%. Erdogan is going down the same way. The CIA coup failed to kill him so that they will get him with sanctions while he helplessly stands idle as Putin.
The west did not take its defeat in Syria lying down and blamed Iran. Iran under the Shah had been the anchor of all CIA Middle East policy. The Shah controlled the massive oil chokepoint at the Straits of Hormuz and now Iran was becoming a grave thorn in the side of the west, namely, the US. Not only does Iran control the Straits of Hormuz, but the US had created a unbalanced Middle East by destroying Iraq which had counterbalanced Iran. The fact that Iran had now established a Shia crescent from Iran to Iraq to Lebanon was untenable to the United States (note the 8-5 missile attack destroying 70% of Lebanon's Port as part of the effort to destroy the Shia Crescent), and the worst part of it was Iran's strengthening control of the Straits of Hormuz with Chinese and Russian advanced anti-ship missiles lining Iranian's shores. These missiles have a range of over 2,000 kilometers where the aircraft fighters on the aircraft carriers a range of 1,100 kilometers, and the destroyer Tomahawks a range of 1,600 kilometers making them useless to attack Iran as the ships would be destroyed once they are in the range of the anti-ship missiles. As to the US airpower at various bases the Iranian missiles would immediately close these bases with the planes flown elsewhere before they are destroyed on the ground costing the US billions of dollars. The defensive missiles as the Patriot, THAAD and Aegis are relatively worthless. Thus, the US cannot project any power to open up the Straits of Hormuz. Even an invasion is impossible as Iran has nuclear weapons so a concentration of force cannot be engineered as for the Iraqi war. No nation today as North Korea can survive unless they have nuclear weapons as that gives the US the ability to Hiroshima them or lay them waste as Iraq and Libya. by conventional means.
In addition, by Iran now allying themselves with Russia, this gives Russia the potential control of the world through their proxy Iran. Let's outline the the hand of cards that the Russians now hold with their victory in Syria with their Iranian ally. Russia produces 11 million barrels of oil per day. If the US and Iran go to war, it would be expected that Russia would move troops into their former Central Asian provinces to protect them that now produce 14 million barrels a day of oil or together 25 million barrels a day of oil production would be under Russian protection or control against an invasion of Iran. Russia could move even now to protect these former Central Asian provinces. Iran controls another 22 million barrels of oil a day that it can shut down at any time merely by saying that no tankers can go through the Straits of Hormuz. China produces nearly five million barrels a day. So Russia, China, and Iran control over half the world's oil supply and this is the winning hand that these three nations control. In other words, there are a hundred million barrels a day of oil produced in the world per day and over half is controlled by Iran, Russia and China. This gives these three countries control of the world. Thus, these three nations must stick together. Either they hang together or find themselves hanged separately. This means Iran must be the red line for China and Russia. They cannot allow the US to attack their Iranian ally! It is this that interests the US and not Iranian missiles or nuclear weapons. It is a fight for control of the world. Thus, Iran sanctions are not really about nuclear missiles but the control of the world through the Straits of Hormuz.
The Russians through this control of the world can force the EU to end the sanctions and acquiesce to the return to them of the Ukraine, Baltic States and Central Asia if they so choose or cut off the oil. In addition, they can raise the price of oil and sponsor births in their country and build up their technological industries with these riches. NATO forces are to the west of Russia but there is relatively noting to the east. It would only take a handful of troops to reoccupy the old Russian provinces of central Asia and by cutting off half the world's oil supply by "indirect" warfare the US would collapse as it would detonate the 600 trillion to 2.5 quadrillion derivative market described by Warren Buffett as a weapon of mass destruction.
If the US can succeed in destroying Iran, that effectively isolates Russia and China. Then, the US plan to implement the fatal blow on Russia by cutting them out of CHIPS and SWIFT comes next. What is CHIPS and SWIFT?
The Clearing House Interbank Payments System (CHIPS) is a United States private clearing house for large-value transactions. By 2015 it was settling well over US$1.5 trillion a day in around 250,000 interbank payments in cross border and domestic transactions. Together with the Fedwire Funds Service (which is operated by the Federal Reserve Banks), CHIPS forms the primary U.S. network for large-value domestic and international USD payments where it has a market share of around 96%. CHIPS transfers are governed by Article 4A of Uniform Commercial Code.
The Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT), legally S.W.I.F.T. SCRL, provides a network that enables financial institutions worldwide to send and receive information about financial transactions in a secure, standardized and reliable environment. SWIFT also sells software and services to financial institutions, much of it for use on the SWIFTNet network, and ISO 9362. Business Identifier Codes (BICs, previously Bank Identifier Codes) are popularly known as "SWIFT codes".
The majority of international interbank messages use the SWIFT network. As of 2015, SWIFT linked more than 11,000 financial institutions in more than 200 countries and territories, who were exchanging an average of over 32 million messages per day (compared to an average of 2.4 million daily messages in 1995).[1] SWIFT transports financial messages in a highly secure way but does not hold accounts for its members and does not perform any form of clearing or settlement.
SWIFT does not facilitate funds transfer: rather, it sends payment orders, which must be settled by correspondent accounts that the institutions have with each other. Each financial institution, to exchange banking transactions, must have a banking relationship by either being a bank or affiliating itself with one (or more) so as to enjoy those particular business features.
SWIFT is a cooperative society under Belgian law owned by its member financial institutions with offices around the world. SWIFT headquarters, designed by Ricardo Bofill Taller de Arquitectura are in La Hulpe, Belgium, near Brussels. The chairman of SWIFT is Yawar Shah, originally from Pakistan, and its CEO is Gottfried Leibbrandt, originally from the Netherlands. SWIFT hosts an annual conference, called Sibos, specifically aimed at the financial services industry. Starting from July 2019, the CEO will be Javier Pérez-Tasso.
If Russia is cut out of CHIPS-SWIFT, and 88% of world financial transactions have a dollar on one side, then Russia is destroyed. They may figure out a way to hang on but Putin's popularity would hit the level of Yeltsin on his way out and Russia would be back as a vassal of the US. After Russia is destroyed, China will be totally isolated as the US turns its guns on China. Thus, the US wins the game of divide and conquer or divide et impera. That is what this is all about.
Let's backtrack a bit and go into the weapon that Iran presently controls which is shutting the Straits of Hormuz. Overhanging the world financial system are about 2.5 quadrillion dollars of derivatives which is about 28.6 times the 87.3 trillion dollar world GDP (There are various derivative estimates and this comes from a high Swiss source. The Bank for International Settlements estimates about 560 trillion of derivatives while others go to 1.2 quadrillion saying the BIS mostly has derivatives held by the banks that they base their calculations on and these are hardly representative of the entire world exposure.). Warren Buffett correctly describes these derivatives as financial weapons of mass destruction. 560 trillion dollars which is quite enough in theory to bring down the entire financial system (world GDP is 87.3 trillion dollars in 2019) if triggered by the closing of the Straits but again Swiss sources say it is from 1.2 to 2.5 quadrillion. In other words, the US is destroyed if the Straits are shut as stress tests at Goldman Sachs say the oil price would rise from $70.00 a barrel to $500.00 to a $1,000.00 a barrel at the loss of 22% of the oil supply through the Straits of Hormuz or 22 million barrels a day. While there are significant oil reserves in storage in different countries, and the ability to divert by pipeline about three million barrels a day to the Indian Ocean, this would not make a big enough dent in the collapsing daily supply to make a difference.
If the price of oil rose to a thousand dollars a barrels, and there are a hundred million barrels a day coming out of the ground, this would constitute 45% of the world GDP from less than 4% of the world GDP at seventy dollars a barrel. And yet that is not all. Even if we calculate the temporary effects of storage, and the 78 million barrels a day, and three million barrels a day routed over pipelines to the Indian Ocean, this blow will be sufficient to start the nuclear chain reaction of the derivative market and anyone who does not think so should call up Warren Buffett whom we are sure will agree that we will be in a worldwide depression that this financial weapon of mass destruction would produce. This world depression would be worse than 1929 which will cause the overthrow of all western democratic systems as in Germany in 1933 including that of the United States. There will be hell to pay for the Trotskyites of the west.
This is becoming clear by the recent economic gyrations of the US based on the shut down of the economy based on the fear of the coronavirus leading to a 32.9% decline in the US GDP for the second quarter which could be said to be the equivalent of the reparations problem of Germany in 1933 that was caused by its moral decline before World War One that cost them the war. Here we find the US falling apart under similar economic stress after a more extreme moral decline here reflected in the laws legalizing sodomitic marriage and 60 million abortion murders not to speak of the US sponsored 1.5 billion abortion murders worldwide. These abortion murder figures are very much understated as they do not reflect the after morning pill. The US has fallen so low morally that rioters have destroyed 400 cities and the troops have not been called out to end the rioting by shooting the rioters or firing cannons with shrapnel successfully used by Napoleon Bonaparte to clear the Parisian streets. This reflects a total moral breakdown and loss of nerve in the face of Leninist BLM-ANTIFA PSYOPS OPERATORS set up by a foreign power as the Bolshevik Revolution. New York City that reflects 10% of the US GDP has had most of their business leaders fleeing the city as it faces total bankruptcy by allowing the rioters to take over the streets and stabbing the police in the back leading to massively soaring crime rates. New York City is Weimar Berlin.
We saw that stress in 2008 when the disaster was only confined by papering over with 400 years of new Federal Reserve Credit to replace the destruction of derivative instruments. From 1914 to 2008 about 900 billion dollars of Federal Reserve Credit was created before it was fractionalized into the banking system to about 18 trillion M-3 at one point, but we raised that to about 4.6 trillion dollars after the crash to maintain the monetary aggregates so that they would not contract as in 1929. 2.7 trillion was created in this aggregate as excess reserves that did not fractionalize as the Fed paid interest on it to the banks higher than market to cover all their assets that had been destroyed and they were gradually written off against this income as planned.
Today we have created 3 trillion dollars of Federal Reserve Credit in about three to four months and the end of this crisis is not in sight. The budget deficit is soaring toward four trillion dollars out of an seven trillion dollar US budget. The budget deficit in 2008 was 455 billion dollars and in 2009 1.4 trillion dollars. The magnitude of the US financial crisis is unprecedented in history and it is only beginning.
These are interesting examples of a government bailout of an alleged private commercial banking system since these private banks are part of the public creation of credit or money creation by fractionalization which is supposed to be only a governmental function of making money. The banks were to all intents and purposes otherwise bankrupt. However, if we lose 22% of the oil supply, we cannot paper over the loss of oil. Game over.
I repeat the original question. Can Russia have peace if the west is trying to destroy it and the answer is no. Russia is at war now as sanctions are war, and it is a hot war at Donbas, and Russia must move to defend itself on all fronts before it is destroyed. We see Stalin's popularity rising in Russia to 70% while the present government is losing its popularity. This demonstrates that the Russian people do not think their government is protecting them.
The following actions are required to restore that popularity.
1. The wealth stolen by the oligarchs from Russia must be returned.
2. Russia must move to protect the 25 million Russians outside of Russia and if necessary mobilize their armies to move back to their former provinces to take over control so they are not persecuted.
3. The Central Bank must be reorganized along the lines of the Chinese Central Bank, and no credit can be allowed to be created that does not have a productive purpose. No financing the purchase of stock for speculation. No creation of credit for anything that does not have a productive purpose. Credit should be created to replace all imports by building factories in Russia to manufacture the goods here in Russia. Self-sufficiency will be the rule and all imports except in the case of vital technology should be ended. And as China, Russia must assign thousands of engineers to develop their own technology as ZTE just did to gain complete independence from the United States. ZTE was put out of business for three months when the US would not give them the chips of Qualcomm. ZTE then went on a crash one year program to replace all US chips and succeeded based on a massive effort. They do not need anything from the US anymore and so is China doing now on all fronts. They will be independent in a year or two rather than the planned 2025 from any US technological input. This is war. Is Russia blind? How could they have not seen their Central Bank was run by saboteurs and wreckers when they had the Chinese example before them.
The new Russian Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance of Russia who will have replaced the Friedmanites (another form of Trotskyism) must create plans together with the commercial banks to invest in industries that Russia needs as China does and the commercial banks must not think that they have a right to be independent of central bank control. Commercial banks create credit on their own when they fractionalize their reserves and if they used this credit which is really money for their own goals they would be converting a publicly owned asset to a private asset. In other words, when the commercial banks create credit, they create money that is not theirs as in printing a ruble. The state has a right to make sure this money is used in the interests of the people. It is elementary economics that Russia can grow its GDP at 15% a year if the credit is created to make factories needed to manufacture goods as the new production offsets the creation of credit making in non-inflationary. Such elementary rules of economics are beyond the understanding of Russia today. There is no theoretical limit to growth on that basis as you theoretically could grow the GDP 30% a year or more but there may be infrastructure constraints that must be studied in advance so bottlenecks do not take place. But the principle is important to understand as the present central bank is basing their actions on a fixed monetary base growth unrelated to production thinking things will take care of themselves. They do not.
4. The degenerate rock music and night clubs should be closed as forms of corrupting the youth and leading to promiscuity.
5. Abortion is a form of murder and so is sodomy in its perversion of denying life to the soul created before conception in Heaven, see Jeremiah 1:5. Both must be outlawed. No nation can be great while babies or souls in the womb are murdered. Dante says of sodomy that it is a sin against nature as only a fool sows where nothing will grow. The sodomist takes a fruitful function and makes it unfruitful. Stalin was right to outlaw these vices. Also, all forms of contraception should be outlawed as it makes marriages into a form of legalized prostitution. Stalin taught all the boys and girls that they cannot practice sex before marriage (onanism) and the conjugal act should be restricted to the procreative end only. For example, it should not be practiced in marriage while the woman is pregnant, in her menstrual period or after menopause. The goal of the Russian woman should be to have as many children as possible. If necessary, the state should subsidize births as much as needed to the point woman will want to have babies and double and triple the population. The state benefits for mothers should be so hight that it is more profitable for a woman to bear children than to go to work. This also can be achieved by the father receiving a family wage to reflect the number of children receiving more of a wage the more children he has. That is true investment for the future. The ideal cycle is three years from conception. Nine months for pregnancy and two years for nursing during which the conjugal act would not be used. If it is used after birth, it can only be used if the procreative end can be achieved and then once a month at the most fruitful time as Zenobia of Palmyra. That is Stalin. That is Napoleon. That is the belief of all great men. That is the devout Christian Church belief. And this is the secret of the preservation of female beauty as explained on French television by Bridgett Bardot that she had become hideous because she gave her beauty and youth to a hundred paramours. That is, her overindulgence in non-fruitful relations destroyed her beauty and her health.
6. In all schools there should be mandatory Bible reading which Bible will teach all these principles especially in the first five books where is found the laws. Stalin studied the Bible in Seminary until he was twenty which gave him the perfect background to instil in Russia the most important principles. There were no innocents executed in the 1936 to 1938 Moscow Treason Trials against Trotskyites and that should be our inspiration. All of them were rightly condemned for Trotskyism and treason against the state. The US has its Trotskyite problem on a trillion dollars a year being stolen on Wall Street through derivatives (that is what they are for) just as Russia had faced by Stalin. Russia right now still has the Trotskyite oligarchs around undermining the state. Putin has been gradually ousting them as Khodorkovsky, Berezovsky, Gusinsky, and others but all the other Trotskyites must go and their assets seized as Khodorkovsky. It must be remembered that even the great Stalin did not eradicate all the Trotskyites until 1936 after 14 years of leadership. It takes time to take back your country. Behind the Russian Trotskyites today is Lord Jacob Rothschild as Baron Eduard de Rothschild was behind Lenin and Trotsky engineering the Bolshevik Revolution through their agent Parvus. It is the Trotskyites in the US who are against detente with Russia as the Trotskyites in Russia. They are the war mongers.
A political meeting should not end up rehearsing endless and meaningless platitudes. It must confront concrete problems with concrete solutions.
We must fight for these principles in Russia. Let's listen to Fyodor Dostoyevsky at his speech at the unveiling of the Pushkin Statue in 1880 on how these principles are applied.
In this speech he discusses the Pushkin Poem "Yevgeny Onegin" in which Dostoyevsky says is one of the greatest of poems. But he says it should really be named Tatiana. Yevgeny was a aristocratic, dissolute dweller in St. Petersburg high society going to see his sick uncle who was dying as he was his heir. His uncle died and he stayed at his rural mansion and estate a while which he had inherited. He met a beautiful girl named Tatiana who had an aristocratic birth but being that she lived in a rural area she did not have the refinement of St. Petersburg. So he disdained her. She wrote him love letters, and was madly in love with him but he returned them as a gentleman as they could have compromised her future. He rejected her. He makes friends with the suitor of Tatiana's sister, and says to him he could have his fiancee anytime he wants who had thrown herself at him. This leads to a duel that he really does not want as he loved his friend, and he kills him. He now becomes very distraught, and depressed and wanders around Europe for a number of years. When he comes back to St. Petersburg, he goes to a ball and sees a beautiful young girl who is married to a retired, aristocratic general forty years older than she, and he asks to be introduced. He is astonished that it is Tatiana who now reflects St. Petersburg sophistication. He then falls madly in love with her and goes to see her to persuade her to run off with him.
Tatiana receives his visit formerly and when they are alone he pleads with her to run off with him. Tatiana replies that she is still madly in love with Yevgeny but she cannot leave her husband as she is bound by God, the Biblical prohibition against adultery, honour, and duty, and could not violate that honour out of love.
"Mine honour is my life, both grow in one, take honour from me and my life is done." (Shakespeare)
So he must go. Then Dostoyevsky proclaims that this Tatiana represents the soul of Russia. And I am here in honour of that soul.
David Lifschultz
THE LIFSCHULTZ ORGANIZATION
DAVID@LIFSCHULTZORGANIZATION.COM
______________________________________________________
Guest Posting
If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com applying these following rules.
The subject of your email entry should be: "Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure"
- Must be in text format
- Proper Grammar
- No foul language
- Your signature/name/username at the top
______________________________________________________
Newsletter
If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe here.
______________________________________________________
Our mission at Operation Disclosure is to bring you important news events and raw intel from various sources focused on exposing the Deep State/Cabal and their downfall. We are also focused on disclosing our lost ancient origins and extraterrestrial contact.
Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.
Copyright © 2020 Operation Disclosure
September 17, 2020
RUSSIA NATURAL ALLY OF THE US TODAY AS DURING THE CIVIL WAR
The purpose of this review is to propose the reorganization of US foreign policy by withdrawing from NATO and allying with Russia. The Russian Tsar during the Civil War sent his fleet to the North to demonstrate to the British who had fomented the south in the US Civil War that Russia stood behind the northern states. This had a material impact on the Civil War in favor of the north.
Today we would wish to draw Britain into an alliance with the US and Russia against the EU and a NATO. The US would leave NATO.
The comments below are by a CIA friend who is concerned about Russia sending troops into Belarus. He compares this to the invasion of Hungary and Czechoslovakia in the 1950s. There is a great difference here. When the US dismantled Russia through the CIA agent Yeltsin it stranded about 25 million Russians in Countries as the Ukraine, and other areas. If the eastern Ukraine from the Dnieper east were to be allowed a plebiscite as to whether they would like to go back to Russia, the eastern Ukraine would vote to go back to Russia. It was Lenin who gave the eastern Ukraine part of Russia known today as the Eastern Ukraine which is to all intents and purposes Russia. This may be the case with Belarus as Russia is popular there but not its present oligarchs. In fact, the looting oligarchs in the Ukraine are not popular at all. So the differences here are dramatically different.
Here is what my CIA friend has said to which I have responded to above:
By contrast, Russia invaded Hungary at the “invitation” of the Hungarian government and against the wishes of the Hungarian population, which was hostile to Russia and Communism at the time. Russia invaded Czechoslovakia at the “invitation” of the Czechoslovak government (although both Dubcek and Svoboda assured me that they did not want Russian troops in the country) while the population was in a very anti-Russian and anti-Communist mood. I know because I was in Prague then.
Let's review the history below as to actually what had happened in the 20th century.
Hungary declared war against the Soviets on 27 June 1941. On 1 July 1941, under German instruction, the Hungarian "Carpathian Group" (Karpat Group) attacked the 12th Soviet Army. Attached to the German 17th Army, the Karpat Group advanced far into Soviet Ukraine, and, later, southern Russia.
It must be remembered that most of Europe was under the control of Germany in 1941 and many furnished troops in the SS as the Wallonian SS volunteer Legion under the notable SS General Leon Degrelle for fighting against Russia. It was not too dissimilar to what happened under Napoleon in his invasion of Russia or Europe today which is organized in NATO against Russia essentially controlled by Germany as in World War Two as France under Napoleon. Germany has achieved all its objectives of World War Two today in its dictatorial dominance of Europe through NATO and the EU. The US sponsorship of Germany after World War Two was purely a balance of power move against Russia which had nothing to do with communism as the same sponsorship exists today against Russia that is no longer communist. Only the US has picked today the wrong enemy as it usually does.
The German EU goal was achieved through currency rigging and artful diplomacy by which it has built its industries on the destruction of the US industries. This is analyzed below in my exchange of correspondence with the then Secretary of the Treasury of the United States.
Robert Rubin Correspondence – David Lifschultz
The EU was formed by Germany to destroy the US and Russia. The latter two today are natural allies against this treachery. The EU as an economic unit was set up to give Germany economies of scale even if that meant destroying companies as Fiat to gain VW economies of scale as the US had in its United States. Then, Germany based on European economies of scale was able to do more damage to the US based on its controlled European based economies of scale. This is combined with the rigging of the euro which should be 1.50 to a dollar compared to about 1.04 before the coronavirus. This rigged euro did grave damage to the US industries which is now largely a rust belt. The NATO extension into eastern Europe was solely based on the demand of German industry that they have protection for the massive investments planned for Poland and eastern Europe. German industry was still concerned about Russian power. In other words, the granting of liberty of Eastern Europe by Russia was not to be a planned extension of Europe east under NATO but it was. Germany intended from the beginning to extend NATO east by destroying Russia in 1991.
The Normandy invasion had as its objective to prevent the Russians from overrunning all of Europe to the English Channel. The delay was convenient in that it was hoped and planned by Churchill that Germany and Russian would destroy each other as they had done in World War One which was the British objective in each war. Churchill wanted Russia destroyed to protect India in World War Two as in World War One and Germany to be destroyed as in World War One as becoming too powerful. Churchill massively erred by the Russian miscalculation which cost Britain the loss of India and her entire Empire to Russia and the United States.
The US does not have a massive trade deficit with Russia and Russia has done nothing to hurt the US today. Actually, the US and Germany were behind the dismantlement of Russia which enabled Germany under the guidance of the plan of Dr. Hjalmar Horace Greeley Schacht plan to reorganize eastern Europe under Germany.
The action the US must take now is advise Germany that if the euro is not repriced to 1.5 to a dollar that all EU exports to the US will be tariffed out. And the. US should unilaterally withdraw from NATO and ally with Russia. The EU is the enemy of the US and not Russia.
CAN RUSSIA HAVE PEACE NOW?
DAVID K. LIFSCHULTZ
AT THE RUSSIAN DUMA PEACE CONFERENCE AT THE DUMA
The position of Prussia in Germany will not be determined by its liberalism but by its power ... Prussia must concentrate its strength and hold it for the favourable moment, which has already come and gone several times. Since the treaties of Vienna, our frontiers have been ill-designed for a healthy body politic. Not through speeches and majority decisions will the great questions of the day be decided - that was the great mistake of 1848 and 1849 - but by iron and blood.
Can we have peace when Russians are being pounded with mortars in Donbas? Can we have peace when Russians are being mistreated in former Russian territories where twenty-five million Russians reside? The answer is no.
The position is not so different than when Germany after World War One had millions of Germans cut off from Germany at Versailles as Danzig that was 99% German and entitled to a mandate vote by the United Nations that was denied to it. This was the catalyst of World War Two when at the outset of that war Germany and Russia were allies. However, Germany lost the war and Russia did not.
There was treason within Russia that destroyed their nation in 1991 as during the Bolshevik Revolution. Russia had not lost World War One but the revolutions destroyed a Russia that could have made peace on its front. After World War Two this problem was avoided by all Germans who were left outside Germany being forced to move back to Germany during which many perished. This is even being discussed in the west in the highest circles as relates to the 25 million Russians caught outside of Russia by Yeltsin's illegal tearing the Baltic States, Ukraine and Central Asia away from Russia. Western circles want them expelled to Russia as we expelled the Germans.
The Ukraine was part of Russia for nearly 400 years. The very idea of its independence was invented in Austria during World War One for the purpose of undermining the Russian Army and it certainly did undermine the Russian Army during that war. The present independence of the Ukraine was set up so the local Trotskyite oligarchs could loot the country as a Russian aligned government was about to move against the oligarchs. That essentially is the history of most of the areas torn from Russia by Yeltsin under western orders.
The Kiev coup was set up by Brzezinski to draw Russia into a new partisan war as in Afghanistan and was accompanied by his ordering the Gulf States to crash the oil price. Brzezinski was concerned about the massive buildup of the Russian Armed Forces starting in 2000 in missiles as well as the modernization of its ground forces and wanted to strike before it was too late. Russia moved to protect the Russians in the Crimea and the Donbas and Luhansk leading to more sanctions. All of it was a setup.
Russia refused to send its armies into the Ukraine, even that part that was strongly pro-Russian such as the eastern Ukraine east of the Dnieper River (which was historically part of Mother Russia), so as not to become bogged down in another Partisan War leaving the rest of the Ukraine to be looted by oligarchs supported by the west and watched its internal financial collapse. The west would not fund the Ukraine's economy adequately and let it collapse. Most of the IMF injections were stolen by the oligarchs when they transferred their loot out of the country using the IMF money giving them the western currency. These oligarchical looters were backed by the Rothschilds as those in Russia and we see that evidence in the ownership by Lord Jacob Rothschild of all of Khodorkovsky's now worthless Yukos stock. They are Trotskyites as those in Russia now. The Trotskyites of the Bolshevik Revolution backed by Baron Eduard de Rothschild were also Trotskyites or wolves in different sheep's clothing and stole Russia's wealth then until Stalin stopped them in their tracks. Between 1991 to 1999 the equivalent of the present entire householder wealth of Russia was stolen and transferred overseas mostly to London under Lord Jacob Rothschild under today's Trotskyites. A Trotskyite merely changes his clothing from Marxism to capitalism but never his inner nature. Now they are ruining Russia with sanctions as Putin stopped the looting. Why is this tolerated?
King James Bible: Matthew 7:15
Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.
Kiev was an attempted replay of Afghanistan though in the Ukraine Russia did not play there their Afghani part but watched the Ukraine collapse on its own.
Brzezinski thwarted in the Ukraine then created the pipeline crisis in Syria announcing a new pipeline through Syria from Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey to the EU to destroy the Russian exports of natural gas to the EU and that was the basis for opening up Iran by the west. When Iran did not send their natural gas to the EU, the sanctions were reimposed. In order to accomplish this civil war in Syria, Brzezinski brought in the US created Sunni ISIS to start a civil war. ISIS was originally set up by the US to offset the Shia in Iraq allied to Iran, and to weaken the Shia ally al Maliki, and these forces were unleashed on Syria in a civil war. The rise of the Shia was promoted by the colossal blunder by the US destroying Sunni Iraq. Russia moved in to protect Syria with help from Iran, Hezbollah, and Shia contributing the costly boots on the ground and Russia largely providing air power and they won these allies. Russia's success at the same time blocked the pipeline that was to be used to destroy Russia. The reason all the Zionist Congressmen and Senators vote for sanctions on Russia is that Israel was infuriated by Russia holding up Syria. They prefer Medvedev to replace Putin. Netanyahu is no friend of Putin.
This left Russia damaged in 2014 by the sanctions; the costs of helping Russians in Donbas and Luhansk; the Syrian war and the oil price crash. Since all of this was due to Russia becoming militarily rebuilt unbeknown to Brzezinski until about 2012-2013, it was expected that Russia would in this game of chess move its Queen to protect itself by advising the west that if the sanctions were not removed Russia would default on its 700 billion dollars of external debt. The involuntary default of 1998 had nearly brought down the entire western financial system when a mere two to three hundred billion dollars went into default triggering the implosion of Long Term Capital Management of their 1.8 trillion dollar derivative position and the near implosion of the western financial system. It was anticipated the west would back down but Russian did not move its Queen but accepted the punishment squeezing its population in the process and creating a massive brain drain of talented Russians to the west based on their highly advanced educational system. The CIA could not believe that Russia was so stupid. Stalin's repute as a consequence is now at 70% approval rating and Putin at 25%. Erdogan is going down the same way. The CIA coup failed to kill him so that they will get him with sanctions while he helplessly stands idle as Putin.
The west did not take its defeat in Syria lying down and blamed Iran. Iran under the Shah had been the anchor of all CIA Middle East policy. The Shah controlled the massive oil chokepoint at the Straits of Hormuz and now Iran was becoming a grave thorn in the side of the west, namely, the US. Not only does Iran control the Straits of Hormuz, but the US had created a unbalanced Middle East by destroying Iraq which had counterbalanced Iran. The fact that Iran had now established a Shia crescent from Iran to Iraq to Lebanon was untenable to the United States (note the 8-5 missile attack destroying 70% of Lebanon's Port as part of the effort to destroy the Shia Crescent), and the worst part of it was Iran's strengthening control of the Straits of Hormuz with Chinese and Russian advanced anti-ship missiles lining Iranian's shores. These missiles have a range of over 2,000 kilometers where the aircraft fighters on the aircraft carriers a range of 1,100 kilometers, and the destroyer Tomahawks a range of 1,600 kilometers making them useless to attack Iran as the ships would be destroyed once they are in the range of the anti-ship missiles. As to the US airpower at various bases the Iranian missiles would immediately close these bases with the planes flown elsewhere before they are destroyed on the ground costing the US billions of dollars. The defensive missiles as the Patriot, THAAD and Aegis are relatively worthless. Thus, the US cannot project any power to open up the Straits of Hormuz. Even an invasion is impossible as Iran has nuclear weapons so a concentration of force cannot be engineered as for the Iraqi war. No nation today as North Korea can survive unless they have nuclear weapons as that gives the US the ability to Hiroshima them or lay them waste as Iraq and Libya. by conventional means.
In addition, by Iran now allying themselves with Russia, this gives Russia the potential control of the world through their proxy Iran. Let's outline the the hand of cards that the Russians now hold with their victory in Syria with their Iranian ally. Russia produces 11 million barrels of oil per day. If the US and Iran go to war, it would be expected that Russia would move troops into their former Central Asian provinces to protect them that now produce 14 million barrels a day of oil or together 25 million barrels a day of oil production would be under Russian protection or control against an invasion of Iran. Russia could move even now to protect these former Central Asian provinces. Iran controls another 22 million barrels of oil a day that it can shut down at any time merely by saying that no tankers can go through the Straits of Hormuz. China produces nearly five million barrels a day. So Russia, China, and Iran control over half the world's oil supply and this is the winning hand that these three nations control. In other words, there are a hundred million barrels a day of oil produced in the world per day and over half is controlled by Iran, Russia and China. This gives these three countries control of the world. Thus, these three nations must stick together. Either they hang together or find themselves hanged separately. This means Iran must be the red line for China and Russia. They cannot allow the US to attack their Iranian ally! It is this that interests the US and not Iranian missiles or nuclear weapons. It is a fight for control of the world. Thus, Iran sanctions are not really about nuclear missiles but the control of the world through the Straits of Hormuz.
The Russians through this control of the world can force the EU to end the sanctions and acquiesce to the return to them of the Ukraine, Baltic States and Central Asia if they so choose or cut off the oil. In addition, they can raise the price of oil and sponsor births in their country and build up their technological industries with these riches. NATO forces are to the west of Russia but there is relatively noting to the east. It would only take a handful of troops to reoccupy the old Russian provinces of central Asia and by cutting off half the world's oil supply by "indirect" warfare the US would collapse as it would detonate the 600 trillion to 2.5 quadrillion derivative market described by Warren Buffett as a weapon of mass destruction.
If the US can succeed in destroying Iran, that effectively isolates Russia and China. Then, the US plan to implement the fatal blow on Russia by cutting them out of CHIPS and SWIFT comes next. What is CHIPS and SWIFT?
The Clearing House Interbank Payments System (CHIPS) is a United States private clearing house for large-value transactions. By 2015 it was settling well over US$1.5 trillion a day in around 250,000 interbank payments in cross border and domestic transactions. Together with the Fedwire Funds Service (which is operated by the Federal Reserve Banks), CHIPS forms the primary U.S. network for large-value domestic and international USD payments where it has a market share of around 96%. CHIPS transfers are governed by Article 4A of Uniform Commercial Code.
The Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT), legally S.W.I.F.T. SCRL, provides a network that enables financial institutions worldwide to send and receive information about financial transactions in a secure, standardized and reliable environment. SWIFT also sells software and services to financial institutions, much of it for use on the SWIFTNet network, and ISO 9362. Business Identifier Codes (BICs, previously Bank Identifier Codes) are popularly known as "SWIFT codes".
The majority of international interbank messages use the SWIFT network. As of 2015, SWIFT linked more than 11,000 financial institutions in more than 200 countries and territories, who were exchanging an average of over 32 million messages per day (compared to an average of 2.4 million daily messages in 1995).[1] SWIFT transports financial messages in a highly secure way but does not hold accounts for its members and does not perform any form of clearing or settlement.
SWIFT does not facilitate funds transfer: rather, it sends payment orders, which must be settled by correspondent accounts that the institutions have with each other. Each financial institution, to exchange banking transactions, must have a banking relationship by either being a bank or affiliating itself with one (or more) so as to enjoy those particular business features.
SWIFT is a cooperative society under Belgian law owned by its member financial institutions with offices around the world. SWIFT headquarters, designed by Ricardo Bofill Taller de Arquitectura are in La Hulpe, Belgium, near Brussels. The chairman of SWIFT is Yawar Shah, originally from Pakistan, and its CEO is Gottfried Leibbrandt, originally from the Netherlands. SWIFT hosts an annual conference, called Sibos, specifically aimed at the financial services industry. Starting from July 2019, the CEO will be Javier Pérez-Tasso.
If Russia is cut out of CHIPS-SWIFT, and 88% of world financial transactions have a dollar on one side, then Russia is destroyed. They may figure out a way to hang on but Putin's popularity would hit the level of Yeltsin on his way out and Russia would be back as a vassal of the US. After Russia is destroyed, China will be totally isolated as the US turns its guns on China. Thus, the US wins the game of divide and conquer or divide et impera. That is what this is all about.
Let's backtrack a bit and go into the weapon that Iran presently controls which is shutting the Straits of Hormuz. Overhanging the world financial system are about 2.5 quadrillion dollars of derivatives which is about 28.6 times the 87.3 trillion dollar world GDP (There are various derivative estimates and this comes from a high Swiss source. The Bank for International Settlements estimates about 560 trillion of derivatives while others go to 1.2 quadrillion saying the BIS mostly has derivatives held by the banks that they base their calculations on and these are hardly representative of the entire world exposure.). Warren Buffett correctly describes these derivatives as financial weapons of mass destruction. 560 trillion dollars which is quite enough in theory to bring down the entire financial system (world GDP is 87.3 trillion dollars in 2019) if triggered by the closing of the Straits but again Swiss sources say it is from 1.2 to 2.5 quadrillion. In other words, the US is destroyed if the Straits are shut as stress tests at Goldman Sachs say the oil price would rise from $70.00 a barrel to $500.00 to a $1,000.00 a barrel at the loss of 22% of the oil supply through the Straits of Hormuz or 22 million barrels a day. While there are significant oil reserves in storage in different countries, and the ability to divert by pipeline about three million barrels a day to the Indian Ocean, this would not make a big enough dent in the collapsing daily supply to make a difference.
If the price of oil rose to a thousand dollars a barrels, and there are a hundred million barrels a day coming out of the ground, this would constitute 45% of the world GDP from less than 4% of the world GDP at seventy dollars a barrel. And yet that is not all. Even if we calculate the temporary effects of storage, and the 78 million barrels a day, and three million barrels a day routed over pipelines to the Indian Ocean, this blow will be sufficient to start the nuclear chain reaction of the derivative market and anyone who does not think so should call up Warren Buffett whom we are sure will agree that we will be in a worldwide depression that this financial weapon of mass destruction would produce. This world depression would be worse than 1929 which will cause the overthrow of all western democratic systems as in Germany in 1933 including that of the United States. There will be hell to pay for the Trotskyites of the west.
This is becoming clear by the recent economic gyrations of the US based on the shut down of the economy based on the fear of the coronavirus leading to a 32.9% decline in the US GDP for the second quarter which could be said to be the equivalent of the reparations problem of Germany in 1933 that was caused by its moral decline before World War One that cost them the war. Here we find the US falling apart under similar economic stress after a more extreme moral decline here reflected in the laws legalizing sodomitic marriage and 60 million abortion murders not to speak of the US sponsored 1.5 billion abortion murders worldwide. These abortion murder figures are very much understated as they do not reflect the after morning pill. The US has fallen so low morally that rioters have destroyed 400 cities and the troops have not been called out to end the rioting by shooting the rioters or firing cannons with shrapnel successfully used by Napoleon Bonaparte to clear the Parisian streets. This reflects a total moral breakdown and loss of nerve in the face of Leninist BLM-ANTIFA PSYOPS OPERATORS set up by a foreign power as the Bolshevik Revolution. New York City that reflects 10% of the US GDP has had most of their business leaders fleeing the city as it faces total bankruptcy by allowing the rioters to take over the streets and stabbing the police in the back leading to massively soaring crime rates. New York City is Weimar Berlin.
We saw that stress in 2008 when the disaster was only confined by papering over with 400 years of new Federal Reserve Credit to replace the destruction of derivative instruments. From 1914 to 2008 about 900 billion dollars of Federal Reserve Credit was created before it was fractionalized into the banking system to about 18 trillion M-3 at one point, but we raised that to about 4.6 trillion dollars after the crash to maintain the monetary aggregates so that they would not contract as in 1929. 2.7 trillion was created in this aggregate as excess reserves that did not fractionalize as the Fed paid interest on it to the banks higher than market to cover all their assets that had been destroyed and they were gradually written off against this income as planned.
Today we have created 3 trillion dollars of Federal Reserve Credit in about three to four months and the end of this crisis is not in sight. The budget deficit is soaring toward four trillion dollars out of an seven trillion dollar US budget. The budget deficit in 2008 was 455 billion dollars and in 2009 1.4 trillion dollars. The magnitude of the US financial crisis is unprecedented in history and it is only beginning.
These are interesting examples of a government bailout of an alleged private commercial banking system since these private banks are part of the public creation of credit or money creation by fractionalization which is supposed to be only a governmental function of making money. The banks were to all intents and purposes otherwise bankrupt. However, if we lose 22% of the oil supply, we cannot paper over the loss of oil. Game over.
I repeat the original question. Can Russia have peace if the west is trying to destroy it and the answer is no. Russia is at war now as sanctions are war, and it is a hot war at Donbas, and Russia must move to defend itself on all fronts before it is destroyed. We see Stalin's popularity rising in Russia to 70% while the present government is losing its popularity. This demonstrates that the Russian people do not think their government is protecting them.
The following actions are required to restore that popularity.
1. The wealth stolen by the oligarchs from Russia must be returned.
2. Russia must move to protect the 25 million Russians outside of Russia and if necessary mobilize their armies to move back to their former provinces to take over control so they are not persecuted.
3. The Central Bank must be reorganized along the lines of the Chinese Central Bank, and no credit can be allowed to be created that does not have a productive purpose. No financing the purchase of stock for speculation. No creation of credit for anything that does not have a productive purpose. Credit should be created to replace all imports by building factories in Russia to manufacture the goods here in Russia. Self-sufficiency will be the rule and all imports except in the case of vital technology should be ended. And as China, Russia must assign thousands of engineers to develop their own technology as ZTE just did to gain complete independence from the United States. ZTE was put out of business for three months when the US would not give them the chips of Qualcomm. ZTE then went on a crash one year program to replace all US chips and succeeded based on a massive effort. They do not need anything from the US anymore and so is China doing now on all fronts. They will be independent in a year or two rather than the planned 2025 from any US technological input. This is war. Is Russia blind? How could they have not seen their Central Bank was run by saboteurs and wreckers when they had the Chinese example before them.
The new Russian Central Bank and the Ministry of Finance of Russia who will have replaced the Friedmanites (another form of Trotskyism) must create plans together with the commercial banks to invest in industries that Russia needs as China does and the commercial banks must not think that they have a right to be independent of central bank control. Commercial banks create credit on their own when they fractionalize their reserves and if they used this credit which is really money for their own goals they would be converting a publicly owned asset to a private asset. In other words, when the commercial banks create credit, they create money that is not theirs as in printing a ruble. The state has a right to make sure this money is used in the interests of the people. It is elementary economics that Russia can grow its GDP at 15% a year if the credit is created to make factories needed to manufacture goods as the new production offsets the creation of credit making in non-inflationary. Such elementary rules of economics are beyond the understanding of Russia today. There is no theoretical limit to growth on that basis as you theoretically could grow the GDP 30% a year or more but there may be infrastructure constraints that must be studied in advance so bottlenecks do not take place. But the principle is important to understand as the present central bank is basing their actions on a fixed monetary base growth unrelated to production thinking things will take care of themselves. They do not.
4. The degenerate rock music and night clubs should be closed as forms of corrupting the youth and leading to promiscuity.
5. Abortion is a form of murder and so is sodomy in its perversion of denying life to the soul created before conception in Heaven, see Jeremiah 1:5. Both must be outlawed. No nation can be great while babies or souls in the womb are murdered. Dante says of sodomy that it is a sin against nature as only a fool sows where nothing will grow. The sodomist takes a fruitful function and makes it unfruitful. Stalin was right to outlaw these vices. Also, all forms of contraception should be outlawed as it makes marriages into a form of legalized prostitution. Stalin taught all the boys and girls that they cannot practice sex before marriage (onanism) and the conjugal act should be restricted to the procreative end only. For example, it should not be practiced in marriage while the woman is pregnant, in her menstrual period or after menopause. The goal of the Russian woman should be to have as many children as possible. If necessary, the state should subsidize births as much as needed to the point woman will want to have babies and double and triple the population. The state benefits for mothers should be so hight that it is more profitable for a woman to bear children than to go to work. This also can be achieved by the father receiving a family wage to reflect the number of children receiving more of a wage the more children he has. That is true investment for the future. The ideal cycle is three years from conception. Nine months for pregnancy and two years for nursing during which the conjugal act would not be used. If it is used after birth, it can only be used if the procreative end can be achieved and then once a month at the most fruitful time as Zenobia of Palmyra. That is Stalin. That is Napoleon. That is the belief of all great men. That is the devout Christian Church belief. And this is the secret of the preservation of female beauty as explained on French television by Bridgett Bardot that she had become hideous because she gave her beauty and youth to a hundred paramours. That is, her overindulgence in non-fruitful relations destroyed her beauty and her health.
6. In all schools there should be mandatory Bible reading which Bible will teach all these principles especially in the first five books where is found the laws. Stalin studied the Bible in Seminary until he was twenty which gave him the perfect background to instil in Russia the most important principles. There were no innocents executed in the 1936 to 1938 Moscow Treason Trials against Trotskyites and that should be our inspiration. All of them were rightly condemned for Trotskyism and treason against the state. The US has its Trotskyite problem on a trillion dollars a year being stolen on Wall Street through derivatives (that is what they are for) just as Russia had faced by Stalin. Russia right now still has the Trotskyite oligarchs around undermining the state. Putin has been gradually ousting them as Khodorkovsky, Berezovsky, Gusinsky, and others but all the other Trotskyites must go and their assets seized as Khodorkovsky. It must be remembered that even the great Stalin did not eradicate all the Trotskyites until 1936 after 14 years of leadership. It takes time to take back your country. Behind the Russian Trotskyites today is Lord Jacob Rothschild as Baron Eduard de Rothschild was behind Lenin and Trotsky engineering the Bolshevik Revolution through their agent Parvus. It is the Trotskyites in the US who are against detente with Russia as the Trotskyites in Russia. They are the war mongers.
A political meeting should not end up rehearsing endless and meaningless platitudes. It must confront concrete problems with concrete solutions.
We must fight for these principles in Russia. Let's listen to Fyodor Dostoyevsky at his speech at the unveiling of the Pushkin Statue in 1880 on how these principles are applied.
In this speech he discusses the Pushkin Poem "Yevgeny Onegin" in which Dostoyevsky says is one of the greatest of poems. But he says it should really be named Tatiana. Yevgeny was a aristocratic, dissolute dweller in St. Petersburg high society going to see his sick uncle who was dying as he was his heir. His uncle died and he stayed at his rural mansion and estate a while which he had inherited. He met a beautiful girl named Tatiana who had an aristocratic birth but being that she lived in a rural area she did not have the refinement of St. Petersburg. So he disdained her. She wrote him love letters, and was madly in love with him but he returned them as a gentleman as they could have compromised her future. He rejected her. He makes friends with the suitor of Tatiana's sister, and says to him he could have his fiancee anytime he wants who had thrown herself at him. This leads to a duel that he really does not want as he loved his friend, and he kills him. He now becomes very distraught, and depressed and wanders around Europe for a number of years. When he comes back to St. Petersburg, he goes to a ball and sees a beautiful young girl who is married to a retired, aristocratic general forty years older than she, and he asks to be introduced. He is astonished that it is Tatiana who now reflects St. Petersburg sophistication. He then falls madly in love with her and goes to see her to persuade her to run off with him.
Tatiana receives his visit formerly and when they are alone he pleads with her to run off with him. Tatiana replies that she is still madly in love with Yevgeny but she cannot leave her husband as she is bound by God, the Biblical prohibition against adultery, honour, and duty, and could not violate that honour out of love.
"Mine honour is my life, both grow in one, take honour from me and my life is done." (Shakespeare)
So he must go. Then Dostoyevsky proclaims that this Tatiana represents the soul of Russia. And I am here in honour of that soul.
David Lifschultz
THE LIFSCHULTZ ORGANIZATION
DAVID@LIFSCHULTZORGANIZATION.COM
______________________________________________________
Guest Posting
If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com applying these following rules.
The subject of your email entry should be: "Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure"
- Must be in text format
- Proper Grammar
- No foul language
- Your signature/name/username at the top
______________________________________________________
If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe here.
______________________________________________________
Our mission at Operation Disclosure is to bring you important news events and raw intel from various sources focused on exposing the Deep State/Cabal and their downfall. We are also focused on disclosing our lost ancient origins and extraterrestrial contact.
Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.
Copyright © 2020 Operation Disclosure
