Reader Post | Reese In Response to: ShadowSuper Exopolitical Intel Report: "Clones Explained" -- November 1, 2019 Regarding...
Reader Post | Reese
In Response to: ShadowSuper Exopolitical Intel Report: "Clones Explained" -- November 1, 2019
Regarding the latest ShadowSuper Intel Report, which is primarily about the Obama clone and clones in general, there are a number of items that anyone with basic knowledge of computer science should take issue with.
Firstly, the way that pseudo-randomness is described is incorrect. The report states that because of the pseudo-random number generation used, it would have been possible for the Obama clone to use the same one-liner three or four times in a row, without some extra programming work that supposedly had to be done. Anyone who knows even a little about computer science and randomization algorithms will tell you this makes absolutely no sense. Pseudo-random number generators produce output that is virtually indistinguishable from the statistical output of true random number generators, and especially if the Obama clone software was choosing from a 75GB database, the chance that the same one-liner would be used three or four times in a row is so incredibly minuscule that it may as well be non-existent. The issue with pseudo-random number generators is that if you know the "seed" value and algorithm, you can reproduce the results, meaning it would be possible to eventually detect a pattern - but that's something that would be impossible for a person to do in the course of standard interactions - that pattern would only potentially be recognizable if data were collected and analyzed specifically for that purpose. It's not something that any human would be able to recognize through normal interaction.
That said, there are ways to generate true random numbers that would not be difficult to implement for anyone with tech so advanced that human cloning is possible. For example, more on randomness vs. pseudo-randomness and a service that generates true random numbers can be found at https://www.random.org/randomness/
It's actually quite easy to design a device that can generate true random numbers based on radioactive decay in the atmosphere (which is considered "truly" random). You just have to connect a geiger counter to a microcontroller of your choosing, and then send the result to a computer via the microcontroller's connection. You can then access that interface through the programming language of your choice (whatever the microcontroller that you're using supports). This is fairly easy to do, and I did so as part of a project when I was in high school, around 2002. I can't see any reason why it would be more difficult nowadays to implement a true random number generator.
It is also stated that the Obama clone was programmed with 75 GB of one liners. Let's analyze this a little to see how ridiculous this claim is. 1 GB corresponds to approximately 900,000 pages of ASCII text. Let's call it 1 million pages for simplicity. That means 75 GB of one liners would be approximately 75 million pages worth of one liners. The average man says around 7000 words per day (source: https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=4488). Let's assume around 500 words per page. That means 75 GB = 75 million pages * 500 words/page = 37.5 billion words. Now, 7000 words per day = 2.555 million words per year. Obama was (supposedly) born in 1961, putting him at 58 years old. The average 58 year old male has only spoken 148.19 million words in their lifetime. That is orders of magnitude less than the 37.5 BILLION words that 75 GB would occupy - specifically it's about 25 TIMES higher (keep in mind this is a comparison with the number of words a 58 year old male has spoken in his entire lifetime, not just one liners).
Next, I can't see any reason why it would be difficult for the Obama clone to walk backwards. Robots have this capability and have for a long time, just search YouTube. Specifics can be also be found on the Wikipedia page for Legged Robots: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legged_robot
Lastly, doing a reverse image search on that picture of how members of "The Order of the White Robe" supposedly look shows that the image was taken from an "Authentic Ninja Uniform" from karatemart.com. Maybe that's just a coincidence, since the author did say that was an example of what they wear, not that it was an actual photo of any of the members or anything like that... but it's odd. I can't be the only one who finds it difficult to buy into authenticity when I know the picture is from karatemart.com.
______________________________________________________
Guest Posting
If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com applying these following rules.
The subject of your email entry should be: "Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure"
- Must be in text format
- Proper Grammar
- No foul language
- Your signature/name/username at the top
______________________________________________________
Newsletter
If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe here.
______________________________________________________
Our mission at Operation Disclosure is to bring you important news events and raw intel from various sources focused on exposing the Deep State/Cabal and their downfall. We are also focused on disclosing our lost ancient origins and extraterrestrial contact.
Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.
Copyright © 2019 Operation Disclosure
In Response to: ShadowSuper Exopolitical Intel Report: "Clones Explained" -- November 1, 2019
Regarding the latest ShadowSuper Intel Report, which is primarily about the Obama clone and clones in general, there are a number of items that anyone with basic knowledge of computer science should take issue with.
Firstly, the way that pseudo-randomness is described is incorrect. The report states that because of the pseudo-random number generation used, it would have been possible for the Obama clone to use the same one-liner three or four times in a row, without some extra programming work that supposedly had to be done. Anyone who knows even a little about computer science and randomization algorithms will tell you this makes absolutely no sense. Pseudo-random number generators produce output that is virtually indistinguishable from the statistical output of true random number generators, and especially if the Obama clone software was choosing from a 75GB database, the chance that the same one-liner would be used three or four times in a row is so incredibly minuscule that it may as well be non-existent. The issue with pseudo-random number generators is that if you know the "seed" value and algorithm, you can reproduce the results, meaning it would be possible to eventually detect a pattern - but that's something that would be impossible for a person to do in the course of standard interactions - that pattern would only potentially be recognizable if data were collected and analyzed specifically for that purpose. It's not something that any human would be able to recognize through normal interaction.
That said, there are ways to generate true random numbers that would not be difficult to implement for anyone with tech so advanced that human cloning is possible. For example, more on randomness vs. pseudo-randomness and a service that generates true random numbers can be found at https://www.random.org/randomness/
It's actually quite easy to design a device that can generate true random numbers based on radioactive decay in the atmosphere (which is considered "truly" random). You just have to connect a geiger counter to a microcontroller of your choosing, and then send the result to a computer via the microcontroller's connection. You can then access that interface through the programming language of your choice (whatever the microcontroller that you're using supports). This is fairly easy to do, and I did so as part of a project when I was in high school, around 2002. I can't see any reason why it would be more difficult nowadays to implement a true random number generator.
It is also stated that the Obama clone was programmed with 75 GB of one liners. Let's analyze this a little to see how ridiculous this claim is. 1 GB corresponds to approximately 900,000 pages of ASCII text. Let's call it 1 million pages for simplicity. That means 75 GB of one liners would be approximately 75 million pages worth of one liners. The average man says around 7000 words per day (source: https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=4488). Let's assume around 500 words per page. That means 75 GB = 75 million pages * 500 words/page = 37.5 billion words. Now, 7000 words per day = 2.555 million words per year. Obama was (supposedly) born in 1961, putting him at 58 years old. The average 58 year old male has only spoken 148.19 million words in their lifetime. That is orders of magnitude less than the 37.5 BILLION words that 75 GB would occupy - specifically it's about 25 TIMES higher (keep in mind this is a comparison with the number of words a 58 year old male has spoken in his entire lifetime, not just one liners).
Next, I can't see any reason why it would be difficult for the Obama clone to walk backwards. Robots have this capability and have for a long time, just search YouTube. Specifics can be also be found on the Wikipedia page for Legged Robots: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legged_robot
Lastly, doing a reverse image search on that picture of how members of "The Order of the White Robe" supposedly look shows that the image was taken from an "Authentic Ninja Uniform" from karatemart.com. Maybe that's just a coincidence, since the author did say that was an example of what they wear, not that it was an actual photo of any of the members or anything like that... but it's odd. I can't be the only one who finds it difficult to buy into authenticity when I know the picture is from karatemart.com.
______________________________________________________
Guest Posting
If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com applying these following rules.
The subject of your email entry should be: "Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure"
- Must be in text format
- Proper Grammar
- No foul language
- Your signature/name/username at the top
______________________________________________________
Newsletter
If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe here.
______________________________________________________
Our mission at Operation Disclosure is to bring you important news events and raw intel from various sources focused on exposing the Deep State/Cabal and their downfall. We are also focused on disclosing our lost ancient origins and extraterrestrial contact.
Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.
Copyright © 2019 Operation Disclosure